July 26, 2004

Little white truths

I still haven't applied for what I'm going to pre-emptively label my job. Don't worry, I'm not giving up on it, I've just been doing some research and preparation beforehand - forearmed is forewarned, to trot out a comforting cliche. I've learned for example, that the particular branch that's being set up will open with a staff of 10, with larger numbers coming on board the following year. It's a comfortingly small number, despite the fact that this can only result in increased competition for the available posts - competition which I'll hazard will be quite fierce. But I'm relatively sanguine about it : nothing ventured, nothing gained. Nothing to lose.

The process of applying for the job involves filling out an application form online. I haven't completed it, but I've stared at it and thought about it a lot. Several open ended questions and one important true/false checkbox that I'll come back to in a moment. I spent some time writing answers to the first few questions, in my usual reticent, unflattering and brutally honest manner, and surprisingly, having read over what I've written so far, even I'd have to admit that I sound like an capable candidate, perhaps even an impressive one - on paper at least.

But there remains one outstanding question, that all important checkbox which troubles me so. It simply asks if I have experience of a number of technologies. And the majority I do, at what I consider to be an extremely high level - and certainly those what I consider the significant skills. But there are two outstanding skills that I must confess I'm far from expert at. Hence my quandary: do I check the box, perhaps falsely giving the impression that I'm more capable than I actually am, or leave it unchecked, but risk forfeiting my chances at an early stage.

I discussed the situation with a friend at work, and, having read the question, he pointed it out that I wasn't being asked to rate my skills, rather it merely enquired as to whether I had experience of these technologies. From that viewpoint, I may yet be able to answer yes with a clear conscience, since it is true... from a certain point of view. I feel as though I've veered into morally grey territory, but I feel I owe it to myself to give myself every available opportunity.

Decisions, decisions...

Thought iMark at July 26, 2004 10:04 PM | TrackBack

Comments

'Experience' is a very different phrase to 'expertise.' Heck, *I* have 'experience' of, say, PHP. I'd hesitate to say I have any real skill, but it's something I've been exposed to, and could pick up again somewhat rapidly. So, yes, 'experience.'

If they were looking for a contract programmer it'd be different, but assuming this is a proper job - hell, tick the boxes. If it really matters, you can skim a book or two before you start.

Posted by: Jonathan Sanderson at July 27, 2004 12:52 AM

I agree Johnathan, if asked say you used it a while ago and as a consequence are not au fait just yet, but a few weeks on the job will put that right.

Works for me.

Posted by: Watski at July 27, 2004 03:28 PM

Never mind learning it on the job. I've started studying it now!

Posted by: iMark at July 27, 2004 03:38 PM

Mark, if the question is "do you have experience with the technology", and you, whilst not a guru of that language have some experience with it then you should answer yes. Especially since you are reading through the materials to ramp up to a high proficiency level.

Posted by: Jim at July 27, 2004 06:10 PM

Basically I agree with everyone else: tick the boxes.

However, I would look at it like this: What you say in an application should be determined by its consequences for the interview. From your perspective, the role of the application is to get you the interview, when they will see what a wonderful, charming, highly skilled person you are and offer you the job. From their point of view the point of the application is to give the interviewer something to ask about.

So consider two things:

1. Does ticking the box make the difference between getting and not getting the interview ? People ask about all kinds of random stuff in application forms, not all of them important. Presumably you can tell this from the job spec. If you're not sure, send it to me and I'll tell you :)

2. When they ask you about the topic at hand at the interview, will you be able to answer and make a good impressioon ?

Given what I know of the situation, I would guess the answer to (1) is "no", and the answer to (2) is "yes". If they're only asking about "experience", it can't be that important, and they won't mind if you say "I have done (something not very bit) with it, but I've been reading about it more for this interview and found (something interesting)". Within reason, never be afraid to say you read more about something in preparation for the interview. Interviewers love it.

Posted by: simon at July 27, 2004 10:01 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?